The BBC
The dismissal of a former Metropolitan Police officer over his failure to supply a pattern for a medicine take a look at has been overturned.
Former commander Julian Bennett – who wrote the drive's medication technique for 2017-21 – was discovered to have dedicated gross misconduct by refusing to supply a urine specimen after being accused of smoking hashish.
On Friday he appealed towards his dismissal earlier than the Police Enchantment Tribunal and it was overturned.
Scotland Yard stated it was contemplating a authorized problem to the choice, saying senior officers had been anticipated to “lead by instance”.
An additional listening to is because of happen and Mr Bennett is not going to return to obligation whereas the drive “weighs up its choices”, the Met stated.
Assistant Commissioner Matt Twist stated: “I’m deeply involved by this resolution and I’ve little doubt that the general public and dealing colleagues throughout the Met will likely be appalled that this case stays unsolved after so lengthy.
“It illustrates very clearly why reform of the misconduct course of is so obligatory and why the Met is asking for pressing change.”
“Hashish earlier than breakfast”
In October final 12 months, a disciplinary panel rejected a declare by Mr Bennett's former roommate, Sheila Gomes, that she used hashish daily earlier than breakfast.
However he found he had breached skilled requirements when he refused to take a drug take a look at.
As a substitute, he supplied to resign on the spot and requested for a gathering with the then commissioner Dame Cressida Dick.
Mr Bennett stated he had been taking CBD (cannabidiol) to deal with facial paralysis and was involved that the pattern would come again optimistic for an harmless cause.
By failing to supply the pattern, Mr Bennett was discovered to have breached drive requirements for honesty and integrity, order and instruction and discreditable conduct.
His attorneys argued that whereas he had at all times admitted to refusing to supply a pattern, the panel discovered him responsible of a scarcity of integrity that had not been charged.
This meant that the discovering of misconduct was not permissible, they stated.
The date for the brand new listening to has not but been set.
Supply: https://www.bbc.co.uk/information/articles/cn4v9e7y982o
