US pass on Taliban ask could have stopped troop pullout chaos: GOP report | Big Indy News
Connect with us

News

US pass on Taliban ask could have stopped troop pullout chaos: GOP report

Published

on

WASHINGTON – The US made a fatal mistake last year when it declined the Taliban’s offer to allow American troops to secure Kabul during their botched withdrawal, the top Republican on the House Foreign Affairs Committee argued in a report released this week.

After the Western-backed Afghan government collapsed on Aug. 15, 2021, Taliban representatives told senior American military officials they would stay out of Kabul if the US agreed to secure the city, “telling the Americans, ‘we want you to take it,’” Rep. Michael McCaul, R-Texas, said in the 115-page report.

Instead, the US declined, opting to have Taliban fighters provide security in the city – something former senior defense officials told McCaul’s team “would have allowed the US military to avoid relying on the Taliban to secure the outer perimeter” of Hamid Karzai International Airport, the center of evacuation efforts.

Security forces investigate the aftermath of a bomb explosion that killed 3 outside a bakery on Nawi Sarak Road, in Kandahar, Afghanistan.
MARCUS YAM/Los Angeles Times via Getty Images

“[That was] a task the Taliban proved incapable of performing, leading to the ISIS-K attack that killed 13 US service members, injured 45 additional US servicemembers, and killed 160 Afghans,” the report said, referring to the Aug. 26 suicide bombing just outside the airport.

Allowing the US and allies to secure Kabul could have prevented the bottlenecks and crowding of hopeful evacuees outside the airport, McCaul contended, adding that processing centers could have been set up far from the airport gates, avoided frequent closures caused by teaming crowds.

That crowding ultimately made the airport an ideal target for the Aug. 26 attack at its Abbey Gate, according to the report.

“The chaos at the gates and the Taliban’s inability to control the perimeter meant that US military personnel were closely packed together as they sought to screen would be-evacuees, placing them in a more vulnerable situation that was exploited by the bomber, contributing to the high number of casualties,” the report said.

Even if the bombing could not have been prevented, McCaul said the number of casualties could have been significantly reduced had the US not relied on the Taliban to provide security outside the airport’s perimeter.

“The lack of planning by the Biden administration and their refusal to accept the Taliban’s offer to secure Kabul during the [mission] directly led to the bombing being so deadly,” McCaul said in the report.

Gen. Frank McKenzie, the head of US Central Command, told Congress in September of last year that he declined the Taliban’s offer to allow American troops to secure the city because he “did not have the resources to undertake that mission.”

Rep. Michael McCaul
Rep. Michael McCaul said that allowing US and allies to secure Kabul could have prevented the crowding of evacuees, which ultimately made the airport an ideal target for an attack.
Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call via Getty Imag

“That was not why I was there; that was not my instruction,” McKenzie said.

While McKenzie told Fox News on Sept. 4, 2021, that securing Kabul would have required about 15,000-20,000 additional US troops on the ground, the report argued those figures “were predicated on needing to fight the Taliban for control of the city.”

“That would likely not have been needed given it was the Taliban leadership that had asked the US to secure the city,” McCaul wrote.

Fewer American troops would have been needed had the US asked its NATO allies to contribute to the effort, according to the report. However, President Biden’s administration did not tell allies about the offer, British officials told investigators “despite the UK having reportedly explored establishing an international stabilizing force for Kabul without the US”

An unnamed senior defense official also told Republican members of the House Foreign Affairs Committee that the military did create plans for the US to take charge in Kabul because they believed the White House would have “prohibited [them] from considering such an offer,” according to the report.

That point was backed by consistent statements by the administration both before and after the evacuation ended on Aug. 30, 2021.

Relatives of a victim killed in the bombing attacks at the entrance to the Kabul Airport participate in the burial on the outskirts of Kabul.
Relatives of a victim killed in the bombing attacks at the entrance to the Kabul Airport participate in the burial on the outskirts of Kabul.
MARCUS YAM/Los Angeles Times via Getty Images
A plane takes off as Taliban fighters secure the outer perimeter, alongside the American controlled side of of the Hamid Karzai International Airport in Kabul, Afghanistan.
A plane takes off as Taliban fighters secure the outer perimeter, alongside the American controlled side of of the Hamid Karzai International Airport in Kabul, Afghanistan.
MARCUS YAM/Los Angeles Times via Getty Images

“Our objective has never been — and the President has been very clear about this — having a military presence to control Kabul,” then-White House press secretary Jen Psaki told reporters on Aug. 31, 2021.

Despite the death toll and chaos of the evacuation, Biden has repeatedly defended his decision to lean on the Taliban to secure Kabul.

“Asked if he thought it was a mistake to cede responsibility for outer perimeter security at the airport to the Taliban, President Biden [on Aug. 26] says: ‘No, I don’t,’ while continuing to stress it is in the Taliban’s ‘interest’ to cooperate on the evacuation’” McCaul wrote, “despite the US government knowing at the time that such cooperation was no longer a reality.”

Read the full article here

News

The F.D.A. Now Says It Plainly: Morning-After Pills Are Not Abortion Pills

Published

on

The F.D.A. said it made the change now because it had completed a review of a 2018 application to alter the label that was submitted by Foundation Consumer Healthcare, a company that in 2017 bought the Plan B brand from Teva Pharmaceutical Industries. Agency officials said the pandemic delayed the review process and that the timing was not motivated by political considerations.

A spokeswoman for the company, Dani Hirsch, said in an interview that for its 2018 application, the company had not conducted any new studies but had submitted “what was already out there.”

In a statement, the company’s marketing director, Tara Evans, said “the misconception that Plan B works by interfering with implantation can present barriers to broader emergency contraception access. The Plan B labeling correction will help protect continued over-the-counter emergency contraception access and reduce confusion about how Plan B works and further clarify that Plan B does not affect implantation.”

Plan B One-Step and its generic versions — including brands like Take Action, My Way and Option 2 — contain levonorgestrel, one of a class of hormones called progestins that are also found at lower doses in birth control pills and intrauterine devices. The pills are most effective in preventing pregnancy if taken within 72 hours of sexual intercourse, although they can sometimes work if taken within five days.

Another type of morning-after pill, marketed as Ella and containing a compound called ulipristal acetate, is only available by prescription and is not affected by the F.D.A.’s label change. There has been less research on this type of pill, but studies suggest that it is highly unlikely to prevent implantation of a fertilized egg. In 2009, after months of scrutiny, Ella was approved for sale in overwhelmingly Catholic Italy, where laws would have barred it if it had been considered to induce abortions.

According to data published in 2021 by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, nearly one-quarter of women of reproductive age who have sex with men answered yes to the question: “Have you ever used emergency contraception, also known as ‘Plan B,’ ‘Preven,’ ‘Ella,’ ‘Next Choice,’ or ‘Morning after’ pills?” The agency did not break down the data by the type of pills taken.

As far back as the 1999 approval process, the maker of Plan B — Barr Pharmaceuticals, later acquired by Teva — asked the F.D.A. not to list an implantation effect on the label, The Times reported in 2012.

Read the full article here

Continue Reading

News

Who are Caroline Ellison’s parents? Fraudster’s mom and dad are MIT economists

Published

on

This apple fell far from the tree.

Caroline Ellison — who pleaded guilty to fraud charges related to her role in the FTX cryptocurrency scandal, which led to the extradition of Sam Bankman-Fried this week — is the daughter of high-profile economists at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

According to his curriculum vitae, Ellison’s father, Glenn Ellison, was educated at Harvard, Cambridge and MIT before becoming the Gregory K. Palm (1970) Professor of Economics at the latter. 

In addition to coaching youth softball and his daughters’ middle school math teams, he writes “Hard Math,” a series of textbooks and workbooks about teaching arithmetic to younger students.

Glenn Ellison is also an Elected Fellow of the Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory and American Academy of Arts & Sciences.

Caroline Ellison’s parents, Glenn and Sara Ellison, outside their Newton, Mass., home in early December.
Robert Miller

Ellison’s mother, Sara Ellison, is also an accomplished academic. Armed with an undergraduate degree from Purdue University and a mathematical statistics diploma from Cambridge University, her profile shows she completed a doctorate at MIT in 1993. 

Sara Ellison is currently a senior lecturer in the department alongside her husband.

“We were definitely exposed to a lot of economics [growing up],” Ellison, 28, once told Forbes.

Ellison, 28, plead guilty to fraud this week.
Ellison, 28, pleaded guilty to fraud this week.
Twitter / @AlamedaResearch
Caroline Ellison's sister, Anna, now lives in the West Village.
Caroline Ellison’s sister, Anna, now lives in the West Village.
BRIGITTE STELZER

Glenn and Sara Ellison were photographed by The Post outside their home in Newton, an affluent Boston suburb, earlier this month. Armed with several bags, they told reporters they were too “busy” to comment on the FTX scandal.

The eldest of three sisters — including Anna, 25, who now lives in Manhattan’s West Village — Ellison distinguished herself as a precocious math whiz at a young age. 

When she was just 8 years old, she reportedly presented her father with a paper analyzing stuffed animal prices at Toys ‘R’ Us.

Sam Bankman-Fried leaving Manhattan Federal Court on Thursday.
Sam Bankman-Fried leaving Manhattan federal court on Thursday.
Matthew McDermott
Both Glenn and Sara Ellison are economists at MIT.
Both Glenn and Sara Ellison are economists at MIT.
Robert Miller

She went on to compete in the Math Prize for Girls while at Newton North High School before studying mathematics at Stanford University, where former professor Ruth Stackman described her to Forbes as “bright, focused, [and] very mathy.”

Ellison and Bankman-Fried, 30, crossed paths at the Wall Street trading firm Jane Street. Bankman-Fried’s parents are also both university lecturers, at Stanford in California. They became good friends and she joined Alameda Research, the hedge fund arm of the FTX crypto exchange, in 2018. She then became CEO in 2021. However, the company remained owned 90% by Bankman-Fried and 10% by another member of his circle.

In addition to documenting her supposed foray into polyamory on Tumblr, Ellison once boasted about drug use on social media.

Sara Ellison completed a doctorate at MIT in 1993.
Sara Ellison completed a doctorate at MIT in 1993.
Robert Miller

“Nothing like regular amphetamine use to make you appreciate how dumb a lot of normal, non-medicated human experience is,” she tweeted in 2021.

Ellison reportedly admitted to Alameda employees that FTX had used client funds to bail out the fledgeling hedge fund during a video call in November. She was eventually terminated as CEO by insolvency professional and current FTX CEO John J. Ray III after FTX and Alameda filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy.

She pleaded guilty to federal fraud charges on Monday, and has subsequently been released on $250,000 bail.

Ellison was spotted getting coffee in New York City on Dec. 4.
Ellison was spotted getting coffee in New York City on Dec. 4.
Twitter / @AutismCapital

Although she could be sent to jail for up to 110 years for her part in the FTX-Alameda scandal — which has been said by federal prosecutors to have lost between $1 billion and $2 billion of customers’ cash — she is thought to have struck a deal with the feds for a much lighter sentence in return for her cooperation.

Read the full article here

Continue Reading

News

Iran condemns Zelensky’s remarks to Congress as ‘baseless.’

Published

on

Iran has condemned President Volodymyr Zelensky’s remarks to the U.S. Congress, warning the Ukrainian leader against further accusing Tehran of supplying weapons to Russia for use in the war.

Mr. Zelensky told Congress on Wednesday that Iranian-made drones “sent to Russia in hundreds” had been threatening Ukraine’s critical infrastructure, a view shared by American and European officials. In Iran, he said, Russia had found an “ally in its genocidal policy.”

A spokesman for Iran’s foreign ministry, Nasser Kanaani, called Mr. Zelensky’s comments “rude” and “baseless.”

“Mr. Zelensky had better know that Iran’s strategic patience over such unfounded accusations is not endless,” Mr. Kanaani said in a statement on Thursday.

Although Iran has officially denied supplying Russia with the weapons since Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine, U.S. officials have said that the first shipment was delivered in August.

Mr. Zelensky has said that drones used in Monday’s wave of predawn attacks on Kyiv and other Ukrainian cities were from a batch recently delivered to Russia by Iran. The strikes came after Biden administration officials said that Russia and Iran were strengthening their military ties into a “full-fledged defense partnership.”

The European Union last week condemned Iran’s military partnership with Russia as a gross violation of international law and announced new sanctions against Iranian individuals and entities over their roles in supplying the drones that Moscow has used to attack Ukrainian civilians and infrastructure. That followed a round of sanctions on Iranians over the drone deliveries in October.

Mr. Kanaani “once again emphasizes” that Iran has not supplied military equipment for use in Ukraine, the statement issued on Thursday added, and urged Mr. Zelensky to learn “the fate of some other political leaders” who were happy with U.S. support. It was not clear which other leaders the statement was referring to.

Read the full article here

Continue Reading

Trending