Right here is the introduction to the piece
Final June, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced {that a} long-awaited settlement had lastly been reached to finance a $200 million public-private fund that may finance hashish dispensaries run by individuals who have been most affected by the drug struggle. .
“As we speak's announcement reinforces New York's dedication to constructing partnerships that profit New Yorkers and righting the wrongs of the previous,” Hochul mentioned on the time.
However an investigation by THE CITY — primarily based on a cache of paperwork that embody an 84-page near-final draft of the settlement, inside company emails and monetary projections — reveals that New York state signed a deal as an alternative unbalanced that undermines his dedication. to social fairness objectives whereas guaranteeing substantial returns to its companion, non-public fairness agency Chicago Atlantic Group.
The state's Workplace of Hashish Administration then questioned whether or not the fund had overestimated income and revenue potential, the company's inside paperwork revealed.
State officers reached the settlement after failing to draw a non-public companion to put money into the fund as deliberate. As an alternative, Chicago Atlantic will lend the fund $50 million at an rate of interest of 15%, all of which is assured by the state ought to retailers default, the phrases reviewed by THE CITY reveal. The mortgage can also be secured by the lease of the dispensaries, in addition to by a pool of $10 million in money that the state is chargeable for imposing and that Chicago Atlantic can soak up case of late funds.
Learn the total article
How non-public fairness trumped social fairness within the state hashish deal
