July 17, 2024 – The Hashish Regulators Affiliation submitted a touch upon the proposed federal marijuana rescheduling rule (Docket No. DEA-1362). The commentary doesn’t take a place on rescheduling, however fairly focuses on the implementation of the proposed federal rescheduling within the states and territories of the USA.
The commenter requests extra federal steering in six areas to help state and territory regulators in implementing the coverage:
1. Steerage is required on how federal priorities, together with enforcement priorities, will change below the proposed reprogramming.
2. Steerage is required on how federal businesses will have interaction with states and territories below the proposed reprogramming.
3. Steerage is required on how state governments can work together with one another below the proposed reprogramming.
4. Steerage is required on how analysis processes and protocols will change below the proposed reprogramming.
5. The steering is important to manage cannabinoids that seem in two totally different locations on the schedule as a result of federal legalization of hemp.
6. Steerage is required on how the proposed reprogramming will influence banking and monetary insurance policies and directives.
Steerage in these six areas is significant to the profitable implementation of the ultimate rule on rescheduling. With out it, state and territory authorities businesses might be left to guess and hypothesize about federal-state dynamics and potential impacts on state-regulated packages, state populations affected by these packages, and states. during which these packages function.
CANNRA stays dedicated to supporting our members in profitable implementation of regardless of the remaining rule on rescheduling is, and respectfully calls on the DEA, the DOJ and different federal businesses to challenge acceptable steering to information implementation.
CANNRA+Response+to+DEA+DOJ+Proposed+Rule+on+Rescheduling_Final
